Op/Ed


Lawyers, guns and money.

Ed Donath invites you to read and comment about his Op/Ed commentary.

 

 

A Conservative Blog

by Ed Donath

 

Can Sarah Palin's popularity last?  Is Tim Pawlenty for real? Could Bobby Jindal be the Obama Buster?  Will Newt Gingrich ever be a household name again?  Would having an African-American RNC chairman attract a single new Black voter?  Should Chuck Norris, John Voit, Elizabeth Hasselbeck and Kelsey Grammer be asked politely not to campaign for future conservative candidates?

 

With at least two years during which to ponder personality questions like these, what really ought to matter to Republicans and conservatives during the ramp-up for the next presidential campaign is saving the institutions that will help to propel the next GOP presidential candidate to the White House after moderates, libertarians and conservatives get a taste of the new president's change.

 

First and foremost conservatives need to get ACLU (read: get a clue).  As the left-supported legal organization fights for every homosexual's right to a civil ceremony, every foreign terrorist's right to a trial lawyer and every municipality's right to ban the Ten Commandments while defending those who wear alternative religious garb, we must have our own high-profile American Conservative Liberties Unit fighting back at every turn against the far left's hypocrisy.  Actually, our legal team needs to be on the offensive, ready to challenge every leftist scheme that has even a remote chance of being defeated through litigation.

 

During at least the first two years of the Obama/Pelosi/Reid troika administration, barring a complete turnaround of the Supreme Court as a result of multiple Obama appointments, we will have no weaponry with which to defend the silent majority's civil rights -- except for the legal system.  To insure that homeland security, traditional American values and institutions are defended and preserved we must support the establishment of an effective anti-ACLU legal organization immediately.

 

As one who reads the Second Amendment objectively and, therefore, has always believed"...a well regulated militia ..." makes a pretty good case for gun control, it is difficult for me to now advocate for owning firearms of every still-legal description.  But just in case literalists like me have been wrong, we should do what those low-budget TV commercial announcers always suggest:  "Order now while supplies last!" 

 

Finally, it will take a whole lot of cash to out-campaign any sum that the Obama fundraising machine adds to its 2008 surplus-filled war chest.  Priority number one is the election of more Republican senators, representatives and state governors in 2010, so conservatives should make every effort to lend their financial support to candidates from all around the USA.  Mobilizing conservatives to contribute early and often will be the most important job of the next Republican National Committee chairperson and that organization should select its leader accordingly.

  • Lawyers  (in the form of an anti-ACLU/pro-traditionalism effort)

  • Guns (in the form of passionate guns-rights activists exposing the left's anti-American agenda)

  • Money  (in the form of high-priority universal Republican candidate support)

Speculation about potential Republican candidates makes no sense at this time.  However, the left-leaning media can be manipulated if all of the GOP front-runners present a unified message in their TV appearances.  In short, developing a plan and selecting leaders who can execute it is all that matters now.

 

home/archive

send e-mail

 

Reader Comments:


Second Amendment "well-regulated militia" foolishness like Donath's never extends very far. If it's a constitutional right I want the name and address of every gun owner located in one government department, that way if my son gets shot I know where to find the gun owner. If it's a "well-regulated militia" where's the registration and control of who has guns? If it's a "well-regulated militia" why are there thousands and thousands of un-traceable guns on our streets? It's not well-regulated, gun owners just want to keep screaming about someone taking their guns away.

But to Donath's first question, no. To his second question, probably not. To his third question, no-way. To the fourth question, no. To the fifth question, no. To the sixth question, yes. The GOP, which now stands for Gonzo Over Palin, needs to prepare itself for at least some time in the desert. The GOP has just recently spent 8 years shutting out half the country and more. Their ability to bully and silence has come to an end, for now.

 

GOPwoman

(from Des Moines Register)


So, you're saying: In order for the republicans to win in the future, they need to become Democrats?  Makes sense, since the republican brand has become pathetic.

 

brynb

(from Lansing State Journal)

[Lower-casing the name of the political party you hate tells the whole brynb story. - ED]


bryn misses the point (on purpose) again. In answer to the questions in the blog: Yes, Yes, Yes, Definitely YES, why not, Not necessarily.

 

BilBala

(from Lansing State Journal)


Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791.  Note: 

 

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
 

The above is divided into clear precise separate statements to create the whole.

I'm going with the parts that say, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms," and "Shall not be infringed.", means that you can have my guns when you pry them from my cold dead fingers. If you want to know what I have for firearms that's fine. If you want well organized you'll just have to wait and see what happens if the US is ever invaded. Plenty of Vets out here that own guns.

"It is impossible that the whisper of a faction should prevail against the voice of a nation." - Lord John Russell

 

DamagedEagle

(from Des Moines Register)


The key strategy for the republicans will be to organize on the scale Obama did, that much staff, and raise even more cash. As the dems have demonstrated, money talks.

 

Anonymous


Better start now!  I like Bobby...and Sarah still has what it takes. If it wasn't for her McCain wouldn't have gotten the numbers he did.  2% of conservatives stayed home, 1% extra for the Dems from blacks and 3% increase of Democrat voters...there is your 6% difference.

 

Anonymous


"Should Chuck Norris, John Voit, Elizabeth Hasselbeck and Kelsey Grammer be asked politely not to campaign for future conservative candidates?"  Why do you ask? (seriously asking. i am not familiar with their campaign methods or what they may have said)

 

Red77

(from Wausau Daily Herald)

[They either made no impact on people (you are a perfect example) or were so annoying, IMO, that they turned off both the base and other potential voters. -ED]


I'm not sure who many of these people are. Could you please explain who Pawlenty and Jindal are. No an African-American RNC chairman would not attract new votes. At least, not against an African-American candidate.

 

packman20

(from Wausau Daily Herald)


It's not the people in the conservative movement. It's the ideology behind the movement that people have rejected. Right now, this country is headed toward financial collapse. The majority of Americans have shown, through the last election, that they don't care whose fault it is, who hung around with who, or who someone's relatives were. They want a plan, action, and relief.

I used to consider myself a conservative, but when the compassion, charity, and civility left the party in the 70's and 80's to be replaced by greed, Pharisee's and professional armchair generals, I had to leave.

I vote for who I feel will do the best for this country in the context that Christ showed - sacrifice, compassion, and humility. But whoever is elected, I also know that God placed them their, either for our benefit or punishment.

 

Marc1969

(from Jackson Clarion Ledger)


© Copyright Ed Donath

November 16, 2008

All rights reserved.