The president's speech to a joint session of Congress Wednesday evening 9/9/09 was full of Obamacare promises. Mostly they were the oft-repeated, yet-to-be clarified claims that have remained so loosely defined, by design, to allow for more palatable phraseology as the latest poll results and logical arguments may demand.
But his "impassioned" teleprompter address was also laced with threats. The threats, in the form of ultimatums, were issued to both conservative and progressive opponents of the various elements of the bill. In so many words the president repeated that he is not about to take "no" for an answer and that "not another year" will be allowed to pass before some form -- apparently any form -- of his initiative is signed into law.
Whereas liberals and neo-lib progressives were somewhat inspired, if not placated, by the president's crocodile tears during the reading of a posthumous letter from Teddy Kennedy, Conservatives were offered no consolation prize. Obama's repeated admonitions to support his plan or get out of the way when the steamroller shows up summed up his willingness to compromise.
So
incendiary
and
disingenuous
were many of
the
president's
comments
that an
otherwise
soft-spoken
veteran
congressman
from South
Carolina,
Rep. Joe
Wilson, was
unable to
stifle a
loud cry of
"You lie!"
when Obama
denied that
universal
coverage
would be
extended to
so-called
undocumented
immigrants.
Most
cogently
stated are
Rep. Michele
Bachmann's
rebuttal
comments
on
Obama's
speech.
"Divisive",
"partisan",
"dismissive"
and "angry"
are among
the words
she uses to
describe the
tone of his
desperate
pitch.
Ironically,
Obama's most
incredible
promise, as
well as his
most
significant
threat, were
both stated
within a
short
three-sentence
snippet from
his
typically
lengthy
rant:
"I will not
sign a plan
that adds
one dime to
our deficits
-- either
now or in
the future.
Period. And
to prove
that I’m
serious
there will
be a
provision in
this plan
that
requires us
to come
forward with
more
spending
cuts if the
savings we
promised
don’t
materialize."
The
pie-in-the-sky
promise
inherent in
this
statement
has already
been
debunked by
the
Congressional
Budget
Office.
Many critics
point to the
relatively
uncomplicated,
insignificant
Cash for
Clunkers
program that
ended up
costing the
taxpayers
more than
three times
the
originally
estimated
price tag.
They also
reference
the
ineffectiveness
of the
stimulus
program and
unemployment
under-estimates
as reasons
to question
this
administration's
ability to
predict the
results of
anything.
Since the
promise part
of the
statement
might only
be keep-able
by enacting
huge
spending
cuts -- most
likely in
combination
with tax
increases --
if those
cuts were
limited only
to health
care-oriented
spending,
decreased
quality of
care,
rationing
and the
death panels
that have
been a large
part of the
plan's
criticism
would
eventually
come to
pass.
But the term
"spending
cuts" is not
defined and
so it is
likely that
Obama would
cut spending
in
non-socialistic
areas before
any others.
Our national
defense is
most likely,
therefore,
to be
compromised
-- a most
sobering
thought on
this
anniversary
of al
Qaida's
attack on
the United
States of
America.
Just as the
promises and
threats
are summed
up in three
short
sentences of
the
president's
speech, the
lies and
truth of
Obamacare
are
condensed
into another
snippet:
"These are
the facts.
Nobody
disputes
them. We
know we must
reform this
system. The
question is
how."
Each of the
alleged
facts are,
of course,
highly
disputable.
That is
precisely
why there
has been so
much and
such a
heated
protest of
this reform
for reform's
sake; reform
for the sake
of one man's
legacy.
Six truthful
words were
spoken
during the
48 minutes
of the
president's
address.
Four by the
president:
"The
question is
how."
and two by
Congressman
Wilson:
"You lie!"
Next up, more definitive leadership as
your president dedicates
himself to creating jobs in addition to
the numerous jobs that shrinking the
insurance industry's participation in
health care are supposed to help create
but which you'll have to wait at least
four years to find out if any of it
works...